13
95
one,
that
AOVAL
of the wituceses gave
strong their evidence in an instructivorthy a
that he should have expected
better evidence to have been given by the prosecution, and that there was
little doubt in his mind that intimidation
had been used at least to procure the attendance of couce witnesses, if not to prevent that of others, and that the prisenu was prejudiced in his defense.
The witness called in support of
the cave
for
the Chinese Government were
1. Chenug a Simon or Trion Tiong
2. Cheong Tion
both declare they
0/
Kien Tiong
who.
were in the uccised's
junk when the alleged murder
was committed.
3.
Ling a Chine who
says
he
was
on board the junk of the deceased
when he
Song
evao
kitted.
Ko Fat
Yip
who speaks of
another wurder but whe know nothing
audz
of the prescut
5. Len Mine Pine formaty
Lam
hawker,
now a soldier under the Chinese Government, to whose wvidence. I shall allude further
For the defence there have been called 1. Hong Akin who says he is ce
Noug
Corretit
of the cooceed and a salt
snuggler. He has since been arrested.
A
a
pirate
ellatheson, an
2. John et
of Police:
3. Fung A.
shop,
A Kok
a trader in
Inspector
of the Hing
Fat
Hongkong.
4. Chung a Tring, 2.0.12-5 who
an far
I
as
CANN
see was called for t
MORE
when
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.